Bren School Homepage UCSB Homepage UCSB Homepage UCSB Homepage
ESM 223 Soil & Groundwater Quality Management

Course Objective

Water quality is vital for most human and ecological activities. Preserving or attaining certain water quality objectives is thus an important task for water resources managers, and to do so one needs to consider technical, economic and risk issues. Since water quality in groundwater and surface water bodies depends on activities in the surrounding soils and ecosystems, there is an intrinsic linkage between soil and water quality.

The course is designed to provide the tools (1) to determine soil and water quality objectives, through either risk assessment or maximum pollutant loading; (2) understand the technical options available to a water resources manager for achieving the objectives, either through water treatment, soil remediation, land-use best management practices or other approaches; and (3) develop a management strategy. The course uses case studies and existing models to assist in the development of soil and water quality objectives, risk management and technology selection.

In the course, the significance of water resources and water quality is put into perspective. We then deal with the detection of pollutants and the characterization of contamination. The next step is to determine the risk of these contaminants, to develop treatment objectives. Risk assessment models are used to determine the impact of various pollutants on human and ecological receptors. Various treatment alternatives are studied in detail, from the following major options: monitoring, containment, in-situ remediation or ex-situ treatment. We use commercially available software to evaluate a specific site/pollutant combination and determine the probable course of action, based on risk analysis and economics. At the end of the course we discuss different remediation/management strategies, and study several cases. A final project (developed in small teams) combines all the topics.

Textbooks and other readings

We will use some of the last chapters of:

Hazardous Wastes: Sources, Pathways, Receptors. By Richard Watts. John Wiley & Sons (1998). ISBN 0-471-00238-0.

The new textbook for the class is:

Advanced Groundwater Remediation: Active and Passive Technologies by Simon & Meggyes. Thomas Telford Services Ltd (2003). ISBN: 0727731211.

Additional material will be from Site Remediation: Planning and Management by Soesilo and Wilson; Pollution Science by Pepper et al.; Management of Contaminated Site Problems by Asante-Duah; and Groundwater Contamination: Optimal Capture and Containment by Gorelick et al., which will be available in the Bren School library.

I will also provide additional references from current journals, Internet and other books during the quarter to supplement the textbook. We will also use resources available through the Internet.

Back to Top 

Lectures

 

Title

Reading

Related links

1

Introduction to Water Quality Management

(min) (max)

Haz. Waste Mgmt. Ch 9 (browse based on your interest)

Haz. Waste Mgmt. Ch 10 (pp. 487-513)

Haz. Waste Mgmt. Ch 11 (pp. 518-537)

Site Remediation Ch. 9 (pp. 213-249)

EPA's Risk-Based Decision Making

Office Underground Storage

2

Risk Based Corrective Action

(min) (max)

Haz. Waste Mgmt. Ch 9 (browse based on your interest)

Haz. Waste Mgmt. Ch 10 (pp. 487-513)

Haz. Waste Mgmt. Ch 11 (pp. 518-537)

Risk Assessment Tools

Chemical Specific Risk Factors

Dermal Exposure Factors

Drinking Water Standards

Maximum Contaminant Levels

3

Ecological Risk Assessment

(min) (max)

USEPA ERA Guidelines


Fox River Case Study Baseline Risk Assessment

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria

4

Risk Based Clean-up Criteria

(min) (max)

Site Remediation Ch. 1 (pp. 3-19)

Site Remediation Ch. 10 (pp. 255-302)

Fact Sheet Soil Screening Guidance

USEPA Soil Screening Guidance

Soil Screening Guidance: User's Guide

Attachment A: Conceptual Site Model Summary

Attachment B: Soil Screening DQOs for Surface Soils and Subsurface Soils

Attachment C: Chemical Properties for SSL Development

Attachment D: Regulatory and Human Health Benchmarks for SSL Development

PRG's (USEPA) 2002 update (Excel spreadsheet)

PRG USEPA Region 9 (more info)

5

Planning a Site Investigation

(min) (max)

Site Remediation Ch. 2 (pp. 21-27)

Site Remediation Ch. 3-6 (pp. 33-140 browse if you haven't seen this before)

Site Remediation Ch. 7 (pp. 141-175)

Site Assessment (Asante, Chapter 2)

Site Characterization (Asante, Chapter 3)

USEPA Remedial Investigation

USEPA Scoping

USEPA Site Characterization

USEPA Field Analytical Technologies

Sediment Sampling Guidelines (DNR Wisconsin)

Remedial Investigation (Fox River Case Study - 20 MB)

6

Site Characterization Technologies

(min) (max)

Site Remediation Ch. 8 (pp. 177-201)

Watts Ch. 4 (pp.219-240)

Site Characterization (Asante, Chapter 3)

USEPA Technology Innovation Office: Site Characterization

USEPA Field Analytic Technologies Encyclopedia

Site Characterization Matrix

Hanscom AFB Case Study

Pesticide Case Study

MTBE Guidelines

7

Containment Actions

(min) (max)

USEPA on Barrier Technologies

Suthersan Chapter 11 on Pump and Treat

Capture Zone Analysis

Waterloo Barrier

Geomembranes

Permathene Geotextiles

Hydraulic Containment and Slurry Walls (DoE)

Technology Comparisons

8

In-situ remediation: Soil Vapor Extraction

(min) (max)

Watts Ch. 12 (p. 565-6, 574)

Soesilo Ch. 11 (p.336, 326-8)

Suthersan Chapter 3 on Soil Vapor Extraction

SVE Optimization

SVE Costs

USEPA Guide to SVE (click the Soil Vapor Extraction link)

Soil Remediation Services

SVE Model

SVE Clean-Up Radius

SVE Enhancement

SVE Thermal Enhancement

SVE Pulsing Part 1 Part 2

9

In-situ remediation: Bioremediation and Air Sparging

(min) (max)

Soesilo p. 324-330

Watts p. 366-377, 572-574

Suthersan Chapter 4, Air Sparging

Suthersan Chapter 5, Bioremediation

USEPA Office of UST: Innovative Approaches to Site Remediation

USEPA: Issues Associated with Natural Attenuation

USEPA on Air Sparging

Bioremediation Case Studies Summary (Costs and Performance)

Cost Comparison of Petroleum Remediation

10

In-situ remediation: Treatment Zones (min) (max)

Suthersan Ch 7 on Reactive Walls

Suthersan Ch 8 on Reactive Zones

Cost of Sequenced Reactive Barriers

USEPA: Reactive Barriers

Low Cost GAC for Permeable Barriers

11

In-situ remediation: Phytoremediation & Vitirification (min) (max)

Suthersan Ch 10 on Phytoremediation

Introduction to Phytoremediation

 

Midterm

Midterm

 

12

In-situ remediation: Other Technologies

(min) (max)

(Steam Injection, ORC, HRC, Fracturing, Electrokinetic, NAPL removal)

Suthersan Ch 9 on Hydraulic Fracturing

USEPA: Steam Injection

Regenesis (ORC and HRC)

13

Above-Ground Treatment (Physical)

(min) (max)

Watts: Ch. 13 (pp. 588-620)

Soesilo: Ch. 11 (pp. 338-342)

Calgon Corp - GAC

Calgon Corp - Advanced Oxidation

QED Environmental -Air stripping

14

Above-Ground Treatment (Biological)

(min) (max)

Watts: Ch. 13 (pp. 620-627)


Suthersan Chapter 5, Bioremediation

USEPA: Ex-situ Biodegradation Process for Pesticides

USEPA: Ex-situ Biodegradation Process for TNT

USEPA: Ex-situ Biodegradation Process (Biovault)

USEPA: Ex-situ Biodegradation Process for Low VOC concentrations

USEPA: Bioremediation of Hazardous Waste Sites

TRG Biofilters

Waterloo Biofilters

15

Organic Matter & Nutrient Removal

(min) (max)


Lagoons

16

Project Costs

MTBE Treatment

 

Cost Comparison Study #1

Cost Comparison Study #2

Site Characterization for DNAPLs #1

Site Characterization for DNAPLs #2

Treatment Technology Selection

Technology Screening and Costs

17

Summary Case Study

(min) (max)

   

18

Management Strategies

(No handout - see readings)

 

Life-Cycle Design for In-situ Remediations

Where is the Money?

Dominguez Case Study

 

Road Map to Understanding Innovative Technology Options for Brownfields Investigation and Cleanup


19

Management Strategies

(No handout - see readings)

Treatment System Operation and Maintenance: Economic Analysis

The Political Design

Negotiating with Regulators

Developing A Healthy Disrespect for Numbers

May the Force be with you

Dealing with Contaminated Sediments

A Risk Management Strategy for PCB-Contaminated Sediments


Back to Top 

Lab Sessions

General Information on ESM 223 Lab

Lab Groups and Meeting Times 2006

Week

Topic

Lab 1

Safety Video, tour of lab, lab group assignments

Analytical Methods: GC/MS Analysis, Spectrophotometric Analysis

Lab 2-4

Soil Treatment Technologies

Soil Vapor Extraction

Air Sparging

Slow Sand Filter

Lab 5

No lab : turn in your lab reports for weeks 2-4

Lab 6-8

Water Treatment Technologies

Hollow Fiber Membrane

Advanced Oxidation

Air Stripping

Lab 9

No lab: turn in your lab reports for weeks 6-8

Lab 10

Group review of results


Back to Top 

Assignments

 

Topic

Additional Material

Assignment #1

Calculating Risk

SFEI Report

Assignment #2

Using a numerical model to estimate risk

 

PEMACO Slideshow

PEMACO Report

Appendix for GW info

 

Assignment #3

Preliminary selection of technologies

 

Final Project

Possible projects

Example of case study


Back to Top 

FAQs

What are the prerequisites?

Most students in ESM 223 have taken ESM 222, and I would assume you know the material. If you haven't taken ESM 222, read Chapters 1-8 from Watts. It is also useful if you have taken Groundwater Hydrology, although not essential.

Is the lab required?

The lab is optional. It helps some people to get a hands-on experience, but not everyone can put in the extra hours. Relatively small lab reports are required.

Times and places?

Classes are MW 10-11:15 in BH 1520. Lab is 4 4:00-6:00 PM in the Biogeochem Teaching Lab. You will probably only be in the lab 1-1:30 hours each week.

How many assignments and how is the course graded?

There will be 3 problem sets, one midterm and one final project, which will be a case study where you will work on a particular site and generate a report, which recommends a course of action, including cost estimates, as well as a class presentation. The design project may be done in small groups (up to 2 students). The final grade will be based 30% on homework, 20% on the midterm and 50% on the project (30% report, 20% presentation). The problem sets are designed to help you understand the concepts, exercise the calculations, and most importantly develop your criteria for understanding what is the information you need and how you interpret the results.

Can I choose my own project?

Yes, I encourage you to find a site which needs to be managed. Many people have used their Group Project as a basis for the Final Project.

How big can the Final Project teams be?

Maximum of two people. It can be individual. The teams are formed based on interest in a particular site.

Back to Top

Other Links

USEPA Water Quality Standards

National Water Quality Criteria

Criteria for Sediments

Bioaccumulation Testing and Interpretation for the Purpose of Sediment Quality Assessment

TMDL Cost Study

Back to Top