
Course Objective
The course is designed to provide an understanding of the physical,
chemical and biological processes that govern the distribution
of contaminants through the environment, as well as the processes
that are involved in the transformation/degradation of a contaminant.
Knowledge of these processes is essential for designing pollution
prevention, control, monitoring and remediation strategies,
and for risk assessment. We will cover the distribution of pollutants
in air, water, soil and biological tissues, with particular
emphasis on toxic organic pollutants. |
Textbooks and other
readings
The textbook for the class is:
Hazardous Wastes: Sources, Pathways, Receptors. By Richard
Watts. John Wiley & Sons (1998). ISBN 0-471-00238-0.
To supplement the material in the textbook, I have provided
additional readings, available in the ESM 222 section of the
Bren School Library. In particular, I recommend Schwarzenbach
et al. (1993) as a very good reference book, with very clear
and understandable explanations. Some of the readings will be
provided as class handouts. Some of the reading material may
be too detailed for the purposes of this course; it is provided
for students who are interested in going further in a particular
subject (e.g. toxicology, bioaccumulation, bioavailability).
For exams and homeworks, we will in general use material presented
in lecture and the textbook. Since this is a graduate level
course, it is up to you to decide what level of knowledge you
are interested in, and how much extra reading you want to do. |
Lectures
| |
Title |
Reading
(See Bren Library for Readings) |
Related links |
1 |
|
Watts 1-41 |
|
| |
|
Watts 48-139 |
|
| |
|
Watts 155-204 Schwarzenbach
56-58, 63-66, 76, 82-83, 90-97, 130-134 |
|
| |
|
Watts 254-328 Schwarzenbach 109-123, 157-163, 255-328
|
|
5 |
|
Watts 212-215, Schwarzenbach 547-554
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Ramaswami et al. (Integrated Environmental Modeling, Ch.
3)
|
|
| |
|
Watts 405-437
|
|
| |
|
Fetter 400-415 (copy available in Bren lib)
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Midterm Friday |
|
|
| |
|
Fetter 202-243; Mercer & Cohen, 1990 (copies available
in Bren lib)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Schwarzenbach 215-227, 241-242, 328-341
|
|
| |
|
Ramaswami et al. (Integrated Environmental Modeling, Ch.
4)
|
|
| |
|
Watts 333-392,
Schwarzenbach 342-344, 377-383, 399-403, 451-453,
Mackay 133-138
|
|
| |
|
Watts 333-392,
Schwarzenbach 342-344, 377-383, 399-403, 451-453,
Mackay 133-138
|
|
17 |
|
Watts 366-392
|
|
| |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Back to Top
Lab Sessions
General Information on
ESM 222 Lab
Lab Groups
and Meeting Times 2008
Week |
Topic |
Lab 1 |
|
Lab 2 |
|
Lab 3 |
|
Lab 4 |
|
Lab 5 |
Midterm - no lab |
Lab 6 |
|
Lab 7 |
|
Lab 8 |
|
Lab 9 |
No lab |
Lab 10 |
No lab |
Back to Top
Assignments
|
Topic |
Additional material |
|
|
Classification and Properties
|
|
|
Equilibrium Distribution & Mass Balances |
|
|
Transport of Pollutants |

|
|
|
Rate of Mass Transfer |
|
|
|
The Whole Enchilada... |
|
Back to Top
FAQs
What are the prerequisites?
Most students in ESM 222 have taken ESM 202 and 203, and I would
assume you know the material. It is also useful if you have taken
Groundwater Hydrology, although not essential.
Is the lab required?
Yes, the ESM222 Lab is required, so that you can have hands-on experience.
Relatively short lab reports are required.
Times and places?
Classes are MW 8:30-9:45 in BH 1424. Lab is M 12:25-2:15 PM in the
Watershed Teaching Lab (1st floor Lab Wing, BH 1027). You will probably
only be in the lab 1-1:15 hours each week. We do meet in the lab the
first week of classes.
How many assignments and how is the course graded?
There will be 5 problem sets, one midterm and one final exam. The final grade
will be weighed based on 40% homework, 20% lab work, 15% midterm and 25% final.
You should do your homeworks individually to get the most out of the course
and prepare for the exams and your future career. Homework is due in class unless
otherwise noted.
Presentation counts (remember that you are preparing to be professionals);
poor presentation will be marked down. You don’t have to do type your
calculations, but your answer should be easily readable. In terms of numerical
answers, I give partial credit for using the right method, but answers that
are incorrect by orders of magnitude will be marked down significantly.
Back to Top
|
 |